When National Association of RealtorsⓇ President Chris Polychron recently testified before Congress on the topic of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), he called for a commitment to privacy and personal safety to go hand in hand with the responsible use of drones by the commercial property industry. But the legislative climate around the topic of drones shows anything but clear skies. Federal and state efforts to make rules have been uneven, leading to a bumpy legislative ride.
Does the EPA’s own framework for determining potential lead paint hazards in commercial buildings skip Congressional directives?
The Real Estate Roundtable and real estate trade groups in the Commercial Properties Coalition last week filed the latest in a series of comment letters relating to efforts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate purported lead paint hazards that may arise from renovation and remodeling activities in public and commercial buildings.
One of the greatest things about our system of government is the amount of lawmaking done in public. The texts of bills, and speeches on bills of all kinds is public information. When proposed laws come up, we have a chance to see what they are, where they came from, who they will benefit, who they will impact and why, and when the votes are coming.
But because of all the work involved, it’s still a only a slim chance. Being allowed access to this information is merely the first step. For example, NAR Commercial’s efforts on Capitol Hill include this exhaustive work of staying on top of the congressional record, watching carefully for issues that relate to commercial real estate when they arise, tracking their progress through the chambers and replicating all of this for all 50 states in addition to DC.